Sexual maltreatment, in peculiar kid sexual maltreatment, is one of the most sensitive yet widely covered issues of criminological argument in the current clip. It is an highly complex country for faculty members, policy-makers and Criminal Justice professionals. Historically the discourse on kid sexual maltreatment has viewed it as a homogenized offense, with male-only wrongdoers, their victims being immature females, therefore understating the diverseness and complexness involved in the world ( Brayford et al. , 2012 ) . Although this perceptual experience still exists, in more recent old ages sexual abuse committed by females is going progressively recognised as a societal job, along with males being identified as victims. This disclosure has had a dramatic impact on authorities policies. For illustration, the Sexual Offences Act 2003 was put in topographic point to alter the old statute law, in order for the jurisprudence to recognize that females can be wrongdoers and males can be victims. Not merely have perceptual experiences of the gender of victims and wrongdoers changed in recent old ages, but the types of sexual offenses have besides transformed. This is chiefly as a consequence of the progress in engineering which has given culprits chance to pique in new ways, for illustration, preparing victims via the cyberspace, or utilizing it to obtain and administer illicit images of maltreatment ( Elliott & A ; Beech, 2009 ) . These new offenses have allowed sex wrongdoers to perpetrate offenses without holding any direct contact with their victims ; therefore the wrongdoer could be an familiarity of the victim or, every bit, a complete alien. Therefore the definition of sexual offending has bit by bit transformed in order to suit the alteration both in offenses and the types of wrongdoer.
The limited word count prohibits the adequateness to cover all facets of sexual offending, hence this essays focuses chiefly on child sexual maltreatment. It starts by specifying what is presently meant by the term ‘child sexual maltreatment ‘ and examines the truth of the official statistics for this type of offense, placing the job of revelation which effects these statistics. It so examines the historical portraitures of male child sexual wrongdoers, and recent recognition of female and adolescent wrongdoers, associating them to their several gender places in society. The attending so turns to the gender of victims and whether they are normally known to their wrongdoers. Academic research is used to analyze traditional stereotypes and associate them to the world in the statistics, to turn to the statements in the essay inquiry. Finally, decisions are drawn based on the grounds presented throughout the essay.
Definitions and prevalence of child sexual maltreatment
Harmonizing to the Schechter & A ; Roberge ( 1976 ) , child sexual maltreatment can be defined as:
“ the engagement of dependant, developmentally immature kids and striplings in sexual activities they do non genuinely grok, to which they are unable to give informed consent, or that violate the societal tabu of household functions ” ( Ibid: 60 ) .
This is one of the elaborate definitions of child sexual maltreatment. However there are others which are more specific to age and types of sexual activities. This fluctuation in definition can make confusion when researching kid sexual maltreatment as it seems there is no universally accepted definition ( Finkelhor, 1984 ; Haugaard, 2000 ; Glaser & A ; Frosh, 1993 ) . For this essay the definition by Glaser & A ; Frosh ( 1993 ) will be used, in concurrence with the definitions set out in the Sexual Offences Act 2003 which defines kid maltreatment as maltreatment perpetrated by a individual aged 18 or over against another individual under the age of 16.
Due to the nature of kid sexual maltreatment, research workers normally work with estimated statistics. In 2011 the NSPCC published a research study placing that about a one-fourth ( 24.1 % ) of immature grownups in their sample had experienced sexual maltreatment during childhood ( Radford et al. , 2011 ) . Shocking as this determination is, it would be hard to do this figure representative of the whole populace, and therefore it would be appropriate to besides measure official statistics. In 2012 there were 10,346 convicted sex wrongdoers functioning prison sentences ( MoJ, 2012 ) . However, this does non stipulate whether they committed offenses against grownups or kids. Furthermore, it is good to work with the figure of wrongdoers on the Sexual activity Offenders Register to acquire an thought of the extent of the job of kid sexual maltreatment in society today. In 2012, 61,397 wrongdoers were on the Sexual activity Offenders Register, 29,837 of whom were on the Register for sexual offenses against kids ( NSPCC, 2012 ) . This shows that about half of registered sex wrongdoers in the UK committed offenses against kids. Between 2011/12, there were 17,186 recorded sexual maltreatment offenses of kids under the age of 16 ( NSPCC, 2013 ) . However, it is of import to observe that this is merely based on official statistics, and a huge sum of child sexual maltreatment offenses go unreported due to a deficiency of revelation ( Cawson et al. , 2000 ) . Therefore, official statistics can non be relied upon to supply an accurate figure of the figure of such offenses happening in society. This is supported by the early work of La Fontaine ( 1990 ) , who theorised that child sexual maltreatment is a concealed offense, particularly when definitions of maltreatment vary widely across different Criminal Justice bureaus. She besides examined the obstructions faced by victims, which prevent them from unwraping maltreatment, and the load of guilt that may be placed on the kid. Several other faculty members besides noted the jobs with revelation, which leaves many offenses unreported ( Jensen et al. , 2005: Staller & A ; Nelson-Gardell, 2005 ; Denov, 2003 ) . This will be discussed farther. By analyzing the functionary recorded and estimated offense rates for child sexual maltreatment, it is clear that this country of criminology is highly complex and it is hard to judge its accurate prevalence in society.
Male sexual wrongdoers
Having considered the prevalence of child sexual maltreatment in society, this subdivision examines the gender of wrongdoers and victims. Historically work forces have been the powerful gender in society, utilizing their masculine attributes to keep control over adult females. This control has transmuted into sexual offending, specifically child sexual maltreatment. Arguably, male sexual wrongdoers target victims who are most vulnerable, in this instance kids, and utilize their power to command them. This is apparent in the early work of Brownmiller ( 1975 ) who argued that sexual piquing roots from the social tradition that sees males as the dominant sex in all facets of life, politically, economically and sexually. The development of adult females is still seen today in countries, such as erotica, which views adult females and even immature kids as sexual objects ( Bass & A ; Thornton, 1983 ; Rush, 1980 ) . It is besides reflected in the stereotype inherent in patriarchate, that merely males commit child sexual maltreatment, as their manner of showing their domination and subjugation of adult females ( Seymour, 1998 ) . This supports the work by Rush ( 1974 ) who argued that:
“ the sexual maltreatment of kids, who are overpoweringly female, by sexual wrongdoers, who are overpoweringly male grownups, is portion and package of the male dominated society which overtly and covertly subjugates adult females ” ( Ibid:73 ) .
It appears that patriarchate nowadayss males with societal chances to perpetrate these offenses. Many feminist faculty members argue that it is the societal concept of maleness which provides males with the motive to perpetrate child sexual maltreatment. On the other manus, this does non to the full explicate why these work forces choose to utilize sexual maltreatment as a manner to show their laterality. Finkelhor ( 1984 ) rejected the women’s rightist theory and argued that if males choose to utilize maltreatment as an look of their domination over females, so they should be satisfied by strong-arming the kid. Their specific pick to utilize sexual maltreatment reflects an titillating constituent, formalizing their maleness through gender. It besides ignores the fact that the bulk of work forces do non perpetrate sexual offenses. Even if they possess similar beliefs refering their domination over adult females, moral have self-control prevents them sexually mistreating females ( Beneke, 1982 ) .
Female sexual wrongdoers
Concepts associating maleness to child sexual maltreatment fail to admit that female sexual wrongdoers besides exist. Despite low Numberss, they are progressively identified in the Criminal Justice System. In March 2012 there were 81 incarcerated female sexual wrongdoers in the UK ( MoJ, 2012a ) , an addition from 74 in December 2011 ( MoJ, 2012b ) . However, these figures are arguably inaccurate, as conflicting grounds suggests there may be up to 64,000 female sexual wrongdoers in society ( Townsend & A ; Syal, 2009 ) . This suggests that estimated figures appear to be well greater than the functionary recorded statistics. The low functionary offense rates of female sexual wrongdoers do non needfully intend that they do non happen more often, and it could be argued that gender stereotypes within society distort the populace ‘s perceptual experience that adult females are incapable of such offenses. This is apparent in the work of Denov ( 2003 ) , who argued that adult females hold specific gender functions which view them as passive, caring persons, incapable of bring downing injury. When society is faced with accusals of female-perpetrated sexual maltreatment, people are loath to believe such claims as they challenge perceived gender functions ( Bunting, 2007 ) .
This unwillingness to believe female-perpetrated maltreatment may stem from reactions presented in media studies. If female sexual offending appears in media studies, words such as ‘affair ‘ or ‘relationship ‘ are frequently used, which could understate the earnestness of the offense ( Tsopelas et al. , 2012 ) . By comparing, media studies on male sexual wrongdoers may include phrases such as ‘abuse ‘ and ‘paedophile ‘ , which provide more acknowledgment of maltreatment committed by males, as they attract more attending from audiences ( Greer, 2003 ) . Conversely, as the female sexual wrongdoer is progressively acknowledged in society, there is a rearward reaction, which sees them as ‘evil monsters ‘ traveling against the traditional feminine gender functions ( Gakhal & A ; Brown, 2011 ) . This was present in media studies such as those refering the Vanessa George instance ( BBC, 2009 ) . This new building, seen late in high-profile instances, is a complete contradiction to the traditional concepts of muliebrity, the maltreatment shown by these adult females being the ultimate treachery of trust, arguably doing more harmful effects than male wrongdoers. Furthermore, beliing the statement that merely male sexual wrongdoers exist.
The contradictions in media studies sing female wrongdoers could arguably take to the hinderance of revelation from victims, and partly explicate the low recorded offense rates of female-perpetrated maltreatment. If victims believe that the media, the populace and Criminal Justice bureaus are in a certain sum of confusion and make non take this maltreatment earnestly, they may experience it is non deserving exposing their maltreatment ( Denov, 2003 ) . It is interesting to observe that, in the present clip, there is a important difference between the figure of sentenced female sexual wrongdoers ( MoJ, 2012a ) and the Numberss of calls that bureaus, such as the NSPCC, have received from victims claiming to hold experienced female sexual maltreatment. In 2008/09 ChildLine received 2,142 calls describing female-perpetrated maltreatment ( NSPCC, 2009 ) . This figure shows a disagreement between a kid describing female-perpetrated maltreatment to ChildLine, and the female wrongdoer traveling through the Criminal Justice System and finally to strong belief.
It should be noted that there are a figure of issues which can impact strong belief rates. For illustration, if the general public holds a deficiency of consciousness of female sexual offending, so debatably, jurymans sitting on such instances may besides keep similar neglect ( Quas et al. , 2002 ) . This is apparent in Rogers & A ; Davies ‘ ( 2007 ) survey into public perceptual experiences of victims and culprits of child sexual maltreatment instances. They found that victims of male-perpetrated maltreatment were seen as more believable and credible in their histories than those of female-perpetrated maltreatment. Victims of child sexual maltreatment are frequently fearful that no 1 will believe them if they unwrap ; this is even more so in instances of female-perpetrated ill-treatment, as the general populace are loath to admit this signifier of maltreatment. Therefore, their victims have even less chance to talk up and are likely to see even more anxiousnesss sing revelation ( Jensen et al. , 2005 ) . Rogers & A ; Davies ‘ ( 2007 ) research besides acknowledged that maltreatment committed by males was viewed as more terrible than that by females. However, many faculty members would reject this claim, as female maltreatment is arguably more detrimental in other ways. For illustration, it may go forth victims with harmful psychological effects, as they do non merely see physical maltreatment, but besides a complete treachery of trust. Elliott ‘s ( 1994 ) survey identified that victims of female maltreatment are frequently left with baffled feelings of love and hatred towards their maltreater, particularly when they are a household member, for illustration, their female parent. As already identified, issues of revelation and incredulity can hold an consequence on the sum of female-perpetrated maltreatment that is reported, and may supply an account for the low figures of recorded offenses. This ultimately causes agnosticism about whether this signifier of maltreatment really occurs, and fuels the belief that child sexual maltreatment is a preponderantly male offense. But, as already acknowledged, this is non the world.
Adolescent and child sexual wrongdoers
If the statement that child sexual wrongdoers are preponderantly male is accepted, so it would propose that they are big males. However, there has been a recent involvement among faculty members in stripling and child sexual offending, which pose a complex societal job ( Righthand & A ; Welch, 2005 ) . Finkelhor et Al. ( 2009 ) identified that in the USA, 35.6 % of recorded sexual offenses were committed by juveniles. 16 % of these were under the age of 12 and 7 % were female juvenile wrongdoers. This contradicts the statement that male grownups are preponderantly responsible for sexual offenses against kids. Although it is developmentally expected that striplings may show a scope of sexual behavior, some younger kids besides show sexual behavior inappropriate for their age. Besides some striplings go beyond normal sexual behavior by moving in a sexually aggressive mode, which makes others experience uncomfortable ( Ryan et al. , 2010 ) . Arguably, this inappropriate sexual behavior could be a consequence of other influences in their lives, for illustration, if they were abused themselves or exposed to sexual force such as in writing erotica ( Rasmussen et al. , 2013 ; Blues et al. , 1999 ) . Therefore, these wrongdoers may be in denial over the opprobrious behavior they show.
It has besides been acknowledged that many juvenile sexual wrongdoers start their offending at a really early age. This is apparent in Kubik et Al. ‘s ( 2003 ) survey which found that female adolescent sexual wrongdoers began their offending at a younger age than non-sexual wrongdoers. They besides found that the literature on adolescent sexual wrongdoers had preponderantly used male samples, so intervention theoretical accounts have been specifically designed for male juvenile wrongdoers. However, it has been identified that female juvenile sexual maltreaters have usually experienced more terrible histories of ill-treatment than male wrongdoers ( ibid ) . Therefore, they could be viewed by society as holding more serious jobs and could potentially be more unsafe than male juvenile wrongdoers. Hence, more attending should be paid to their single demands, in order to forestall farther hazard to society ( Ibid ; Sahlstrom & A ; Jeglic, 2008 ; Mathews et al. , 1997 ) . Interestingly, the deficiency of empirical work on female adolescent sexual wrongdoers may be another account as to why child sexual maltreatment is seen to be preponderantly male-perpetrated. Furthermore, this demonstrates that kid sexual maltreatment is non committed by a homogenous population of male grownups, whereas in world great complexnesss are involved which are frequently oversimplified.
It is of import for policy-makers and faculty members to acquire past the traditional stereotypes of grownup male sexual wrongdoers, and acknowledge adolescent wrongdoers, as they are an of import population who, if responded to decently, could be prevented from engagement in child sexual maltreatment later in their lives. Riser et Al. ( 2013 ) theorised that recidivistic sexual wrongdoers tend to perpetrate sexual offenses over clip which can cross across young person through to adulthood. Thus it is of import to step in every bit early as possible, and utilize intervention theoretical accounts designed with the juvenile wrongdoers ‘ demands in head. If effectual, this should forestall such wrongdoers from reoffending. This is supported by Carpentier & A ; Proulx ( 2011 ) who agree that if immature child sexual wrongdoers respond to intervention programmes they are less prone to reoffend in their grownup life. Furthermore, if Criminal Justice bureaus and policy-makers can recognize these types of wrongdoers alternatively of merely mentioning to the stereotyped kid sexual wrongdoer, they may be able to discourage recidivism. This may protect more kids potentially at hazard of sing juvenile-turned- grownup perpetrated sexual maltreatment.
Male and female victims
In add-on to research placing adolescent sexual wrongdoers, there are besides surveies demoing that adolescent male victims exist. These persons are normally victims of female-perpetrated sexual maltreatment and there is frequently misunderstanding among society sing the earnestness of this type of piquing. Mathews et Al. ( 1989 ) were among the first to place these victims in their work on female sexual wrongdoer typologies. They identified that some female sexual wrongdoers target male stripling victims, seldom sing their manners as maltreatment, but more as sexually educating their victims in a harmless manner. On the rare juncture that this type of maltreatment enters media studies, it may be reported as ‘a relationship ‘ between the female wrongdoer and male victim ( Tsopelas et al. , 2012 ) , instead than a signifier of ill-treatment, therefore underacting the earnestness of the offense. This challenges the statement that child maltreatment victims are preponderantly female, as there is clear grounds that males besides experience sexual maltreatment, although arguably in a different mode from that experienced by female victims ( Pierce & A ; Pierce, 1985 ) .
One justification for the still existing female victim stereotype is the traditional construct of muliebrity which views females as the vulnerable gender who are unable to protect themselves, and therefore are at a higher hazard of exploitation ( Brownmiller, 1975 ; Spiegel, 2003 ) . The stereotype besides relates to miss of revelation by male victims. It has already been identified that there are complex issues forestalling revelation of female sexual maltreatment victims, so it is non surprising that male victims experience the same, if non more issues debaring their revelation. One of the chief findings from empirical research on this subject was that male victims frequently do non unwrap maltreatment for grounds associating to maleness. Graham ( 2006 ) recognised that males may non unwrap their maltreatment as they feel they need to protect their butch repute, and unwraping maltreatment would label them as a victim, which is a direct contradiction to the construct of maleness. This concluding histories for the limited figure of recorded male victims of sexual maltreatment, which was apparent in the 2011/12 constabularies recorded offenses. These showed 889 recorded colzas of male kids under 16, compared with 4,991 colzas of female kids under 16 ( NSPCC, 2013 ) . This proves that male victims accounted for approximately 18 % of the recorded colzas of kids under 16 in 2011/12, and could back up the statement that victims of kid maltreatment are preponderantly female. However, this does non intend that other males, in add-on, do non besides see kid maltreatment. Therefore, it is of import for Criminal Justice professionals, policy-makers and faculty members to admit male victims in order to turn to issues that may forestall these victims from unwraping their maltreatment.
Child sexual wrongdoers: aliens or familiarities?
Having established that kid sexual wrongdoers can be both male and female of assorted ages, and victims can besides be male or female, beliing with the statement in the essay inquiry, the attending is now on whether victims are known to sexual wrongdoers. Much attending in literature is on the myth environing child sexual maltreatment being committed by a alien. It could be suggested that this is partially a consequence of media studies. Cheit ( 2003 ) discovered that newspapers have a wont of underscoring ‘stranger danger ‘ in their studies, and under-representing intra-familial sexual maltreatment. Thus it is non surprising that society, or more specifically, parents, believe that this is the most common signifier of maltreatment and therefore may be wary of aliens around their kids. Cromer & A ; Goldsmith ( 2010 ) identified a figure of myths associating to child sexual maltreatment. They found that a common myth was that culprits were merely males and were aliens to the kids with some kind of mental unwellness or of low societal position. Another common stereotype found was that knowing persons, of high societal position would non mistreat kids. Despite many participants differing with these myths, it was discovered that several still held these sentiments ( command ) . However, this is non proven to be true in the instance of Neil Dyer, a primary school caput instructor who was convicted in 2011 of 25 counts of sexual assault on students ( BBC, 2011 ) . As a caput instructor, he held a well-thought-of place in society, and besides knew his victims, therefore rejecting the myths presented by Cromer & A ; Goldsmith ( 2010 ) . Traditional myths are besides contested by the research of Cawson et Al. ( 2000 ) , who found that big Numberss of victims of child sexual maltreatment reported that their culprit was person known to them but non a household member. This would reenforce the statement that kid maltreaters are chiefly extra-familial and possibly difficult to observe due to their trusted relationship with the victim or esteemed place in society.
A great trade of empirical research has revealed that the world of child sexual maltreatment is that it is usually committed by person known to the victim ( Cawson et al. , 2000 ) , normally the father/step-father or another male relation ( Csorba et al. , 2006 ; Saidi et al. , 2008 ) . This is apparent in Grubin ‘s ( 1998 ) early work, which theorised that the bulk of culprits are known to their victims, with an estimated 80 % of whom commit the maltreatment in either their ain place or that of the victim. Due to child sexual maltreatment being such a concealed offense, culprits seek chances to perpetrate the maltreatment in secret ( Cawson et al. , 2000 ) , back uping the statistics that abuse chiefly takes topographic point in the private place, supplying a perfect environment to pique. This concurs with the statement that child sexual maltreatment is largely an intra or extra-familial offense. However, child sexual maltreatment committed by aliens should non travel unmissed. As antecedently discussed, types of sexual offending have changed dramatically with progresss in engineering. Therefore, it has become easier for wrongdoers to perpetrate non-contact maltreatment via the cyberspace. Elliott & A ; Beech ( 2009 ) identified that there is a immense market of kid erotica images online, which are to a great extent demanded by sexual wrongdoers. They acknowledged assorted internet wrongdoer typologies, some including wrongdoers who have non really committed physical kid maltreatment, but still prosecute in the downloading and distributing of illicit images of kids. This proves that there are a considerable figure of child sexual wrongdoers perpetrating a assortment of offenses against kids they do non hold any contact with, and therefore are unknown to their victims. Furthermore, although much of the literature identifies the excess or intra-familial type as the most common signifier of maltreatment, society demands to recognize that ‘stranger ‘ maltreatment does still happen.
In decision, assorted pieces of statistical grounds have proven that child sexual maltreatment is preponderantly committed by male grownups. However, these must be taken with cautiousness as, depending on the beginnings, there look to be a figure of conflicting statistics to construe. These findings correlate with the historical construct of work forces being the power gender in society ( Brownmiller, 1975 ) . This power has been used as an account for child sexual maltreatment, as arguably males target immature vulnerable females and command them through sexual maltreatment. However, this construct ignores the being of female kid sexual wrongdoers, who are more complex to understand, as society is frequently loath to believe that they are capable of such maltreatment ( Bunting, 2007 ) . It appears that this is due to the traditional gender perceptual experience of adult females as lovingness and nurturing ( Denov, 2003 ) . Therefore, when faced with these rare instances, the populace, media and professionals either see the maltreatment as a harmless baffled signifier of love, or by contrast, as an absolute smear of the traditional constructs of muliebrity and a complete treachery of trust, making more detrimental effects than male maltreaters ( Gannon & A ; Cortoni, 2010 ) .
There are issues associating to the prevalence of this job in society, as official statistics show a much lower rate ( MoJ, 2012a ) compared with conflicting grounds demoing that there could be up to 64,000 instances ( Townsend & A ; Syal, 2009 ) . Furthermore, this could be linked to the stereotype that lone males can perpetrate sexual maltreatment, so victims of female sexual maltreatment may be less willing to unwrap, in instance they are non believed ( Denov, 2003 ) . This misconception besides links to the position that female-perpetrated maltreatment is less terrible than male-perpetrated maltreatment, although grounds suggests that it can really do more serious long-run harm ( Elliott, 1994 ) . Thus it is of import for the Government to educate and alter social perceptual experiences of female-perpetrated maltreatment in order to react more efficaciously to victims and prevent hereafter kids being at hazard.
Another disclosure was the increasing involvement among faculty members in adolescent-perpetrated maltreatment. They were identified as an highly complex population, necessitating more professional attending in order to react to their many-sided demands, as many had learned their sexually violent behavior from abuse they themselves had been exposed to ( Rasmussen et al. , 2013 ) . Having acknowledged the being of male, female and adolescent-perpetrated maltreatment, an analysis was made as to whether victims of child sexual maltreatment are preponderantly female. This statement relates to the traditional gender stereotypes sing females as the vulnerable sex, who are more likely to be victimised, so it was non surprising that this appears in most of the media studies and academic research. However, there was grounds to turn out that male victims besides exist, but many instances are misunderstood as ‘relationships ‘ instead than maltreatment ( Tsopelas et al. , 2012 ) . It could be suggested that the deficiency of recognition environing male victims of maltreatment is partially due to issues of maleness, where they are ashamed about non being able to protect themselves, as males should be able to ( Graham, 2006 ) .
Finally, it was acknowledged that despite misconceptions, the bulk of child sexual maltreatment is perpetrated by person known to the victim. This is frequently because wrongdoers, in seeking an chance to mistreat, pull strings the trust of parents/guardians so they no longer act as external inhibitors ( Finkelhor, 1984 ) . This essay has highlighted that, while wrongdoers of child sexual maltreatment are preponderantly males, with females being the chief victims, there is a turning organic structure of grounds to turn out that male victims and female wrongdoers besides exist, with wrongdoers chiefly aiming victims known to them. Therefore, the Government and Criminal Justice professionals need to admit the complexnesss involved with child sexual maltreatment, and disregard the traditional stereotypes, in order to react efficaciously and protect farther victims.
Bass, E. & A ; Thornton, L. ( 1983 ) , I ne’er told anyone, New York: Harper and Row Publishers Inc.
BBC News ( 2011 ) , Former Plymouth caput instructor jailed for sex offenses, BBC News, 18th April 2011, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-13117866, accessed 29/3/13.
BBC News ( 2009 ) , Treatment program promised for adult females sex wrongdoers, BBC News, 14th December 2009, hypertext transfer protocol: //news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8412623.stm, accessed 05/4/13.
Beneke, T. ( 1983 ) , Men on colza, New York: St Martins Press
Bluess, A. , Moffat, C. & A ; Telford, P. ( 1999 ) , Work with adolescent females who sexually abuse: similarities and differences, in M. Erooga & A ; H. Masson ( explosive detection systems ) A Children and immature people who sexually abuse others: challenges and responses.A London: Routledge.
Brownmiller, S. , ( 1975 ) , Against our will: Work force, adult females and colza, New York: Fawcett Books.
Bunting, L. ( 2007 ) , Covering with a job that does n’t be? Professional responses to female perpetrated kid sexual abuse.A Child Abuse Review,16 ( 4 ) , pp 252-267.
Carpentier, J. & A ; Proulx, J. ( 2011 ) , Correlates of recidivism among striplings who have sexually offended.A Sexual Maltreatment: A Journal of Research and Treatment, A 23 ( 4 ) , pp 434-455.
Cawson, P. , Wattam, C. , Brooker, S. & A ; Kelly, G.A ( 2000 ) , Child Maltreatment in the United Kingdom, a survey of the prevalence of kid maltreatment and disregard, London: NSPCC.A
Cheit, R. E. ( 2003 ) , What craze? A systematic survey of newspaper coverage of accused kid molesters. Child Abuse and Neglect, 27 ( 6 ) , pp 607-623.
Csorba, R. , Lampe, L. , Borsos, A. , Balla, L. , Poka, R. & A ; Olah, E . ( 2006 ) , Female child sexual maltreatment within the household in a Magyar county. Gynecologic and obstetric probe, A 61 ( 4 ) , pp 188-193.
Denov, M. S. ( 2003 ) , ‘To a safer topographic point? Victims of sexual maltreatment by females & A ; their revelations to professionals ‘ . Child Abuse & A ; Neglect, 27 ( 1 ) , pp 47-61.
Elliott, I. A. & A ; Beech, A. R. ( 2009 ) , Understanding on-line kid erotica usage: Applying sexual discourtesy theory to internet wrongdoers. Aggression and violent behavior, 14 ( 3 ) , pp 180-193.
Elliott, M. ( 1994 ) , Female sexual maltreatment of kids. New York: Guilford Press.
Finkelhor, D. ( 1984 ) , Child Sexual Abuse: New Theory & A ; Research, New York: The Free Press.
Gakhal, B. K. & A ; Brown, S. J. ( 2011 ) , A comparing of the general populace ‘s, forensic professionals ‘ and pupils ‘ attitudes towards female sex wrongdoers. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17 ( 1 ) , pp 105-116.
Gannon, T. A. & A ; Cortoni, F. ( 2010 ) , Female Sexual Offenders: Theory, Assessment and Treatment. Chichester: Wiley.
Glaser, D. , & A ; Frosh, S. ( 1993 ) , A Child sexual abuseA ( 2nd erectile dysfunction ) . Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Graham, R. ( 2006 ) , ‘Male colza and the careful building of the male victim ‘ . Social & A ; Legal Studies, 15 ( 2 ) , pp 187-208.
Greer, C. ( 2003 ) , Sex offense and the media: sex offending and the imperativeness in a divided society. Cullompton: Willan.
Grubin, D.A ( 1998 ) , A Sex piquing against kids: understanding the risk.A London: Home Office.
Haugaard, J. J. ( 2000 ) , The challenge of specifying child sexual abuse.A American Psychologist, A 55 ( 9 ) , pp 1036-1039.
Home Office, ( 2002 ) , Rape and sexual assault of adult females: the extent and nature of the job: Findingss from the British Crime Survey ( 2001/02 ) .
Jensen, T. K. , Gulbrandsen, W. , Mossige, S. , Reichelt, S. & A ; Tjersland, O. A. ( 2005 ) , Reporting possible sexual maltreatment: A qualitative survey on kids ‘s positions and the context for revelation, Child Abuse & A ; Neglect, 29 ( 12 ) , pp 1395-1413.
La Fontaine, J. ( 1990 ) , Child Sexual Abuse, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mathews, R. , Matthews, J. A. & A ; Speltz, K. ( 1989 ) , Female sexual wrongdoers: An exploratory survey. Orwell, VT: Safer Society Press.
Mathews, R. , Hunter, J.A. & A ; Vuz, J. ( 1997 ) , Juvenile female sex wrongdoers: Clinical features and intervention issues. Sexual Maltreatment: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 9 ( 3 ) , pp 187-199.
MoJ ( Ministry of Justice ) ( 2012 ) , Offender Management Statistics Quarterly Bulletin, London: MoJ.
MoJ ( 2012b ) , Prison population tabular arraies, London: MoJ hypertext transfer protocol: //www.gov.uk/government/publications/offender-management-statistics-quarterly-earlier-editions, accessed 2/4/13.
NSPCC ( 2009 ) , Children speaking to ChildLine about sexual maltreatment, hypertext transfer protocol: //www.nspcc.org.uk/Inform/publications/casenotes/clcasenotessexualabuse2_wdf69493.pdf, accessed 08/04/13.
NSPCC ( 2012 ) , A About a 1000 registered child sex maltreaters reoffended. NSPCC imperativeness release, 18 November 2012. London: NSPCC.A
NSPCC ( 2013 ) , Statistics on kid maltreatment. London: NSPCC hypertext transfer protocol: //www.nspcc.org.uk/Inform/resourcesforprofessionals/sexualabuse/statistics_wda87833.html, accessed 2/4/13.
Pierce. R, & A ; Pierce. L. H. ( 1985 ) , The sexually abused kid: a comparing of male and female victims. Child Abuse & A ; Neglect, 9 ( 2 ) , pp 191-199.
Quas, J. A. , Bottoms, B. L. , Haegerich, T. M. & A ; Nysseaˆ?Carris, K. L. ( 2002 ) , Effects of Victim, Defendant, and Juror Gender on Decisions in Child Sexual Assault Cases1.A Journal of Applied Social Psychology, A 32 ( 10 ) , pp 1993-2021.
Radford, L. , Corral, S. , Bradley, C. , Fisher, H. , Bassett, C. , Howat, N. & A ; Collishaw, S. ( 2011 ) , Child maltreatment and disregard in the UK today. London: NSPCC.
Rasmussen, L. A. , Lev-Wiesel, R. & A ; Eisikovits, Z. ( 2013 ) , Current perspectives on Children and Youth who sexually abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 22 ( 1 ) , pp 1-8.
Righthand, S. & A ; Welch, C. ( 2005 ) , Characteristics of young person who sexually offend.A Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, A 13 ( 3-4 ) , pp 15-32.
Rogers, P. & A ; Davies, M. ( 2007 ) , Perceptions of victims and culprits in a pictured
kid sexual maltreatment instance: Gender and age factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22 ( 5 ) , pp 566-584.
Rush, F. ( 1974 ) , The sexual maltreatment of kids: A feminist point of position, in N. Connell & A ; C. Wilson ( explosive detection systems ) , Rape: A The first beginning book for women.A New York: Plume.
Rush, F. ( 1980 ) , A The best kept secret: Sexual maltreatment of kids. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ryan, G. , Leversee, T. F. & A ; Lane, S. ( 2010 ) , A Juvenile sexual offending: Causes, effects, and rectification ( 3rd erectile dysfunction ) . New Jersey: Wiley.
Sahlstrom, K. J. & A ; Jeglic, E. L. ( 2008 ) , Factors Affecting Attitudes Toward Juvenile Sex Offenders. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 17 ( 2 ) , pp 180-196.
Saidi, H. , Odula, P. & A ; Awori, K. ( 2008 ) , Child ill-treatment at a force recovery Centre in Kenya.A Tropical physician, A 38 ( 2 ) , pp 87-89.
Schechter, M. & A ; Roberge, L. ( 1976 ) , Child Sexual Abuse, in R. Helfer & A ; C. Kempe ( explosive detection systems ) . Child Abuse and Neglect: The Family and the Community, Cambridge: Ballinger.
Seymour, A. ( 1998 ) , Aetiology of the sexual maltreatment of kids: an drawn-out women’s rightist position, Women ‘s Studies International Forum, 21 ( 4 ) , pp 415-427.
Spiegel, J. ( 2003 ) , A Sexual maltreatment of males: The SAM theoretical account of theory and pattern. Psychology Press.
Staller, K. M. & A ; Nelson-Gardell, D. ( 2005 ) , A load in your bosom ” : Lessons of revelation from female preadolescent and adolescent subsisters of sexual maltreatment. Child Abuse & A ; Neglect, A 29 ( 12 ) , pp 1415-1432.
Tsopelas, C. , Tsetsou, S. , Ntounas, P. & A ; Douzenis, A. ( 2012 ) , Female culprits of sexual maltreatment of bush leagues: What are the effects for the victims? , International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, pp 305-310.