Tourism sector is one of the most growing sectors in the universe. During the last decennaries at that place has been an addition in the field of surveies that analyze the impact of touristry for state and its development. As every country of surveies tourism as a portion of national and universe economic system has its disciples and oppositions. All of writers in their surveies. plants and probes provide us with argues that confirm their sentiments. We besides suppose that touristry has positive and negative impacts as every sector of economic system and every portion of societal life. And in our essay we would wish to present negative sides of touristry industry. Our work consists of few chief purposes.
First we are traveling to show five Regional studies with menaces for the following touristry parts: South West Oltenia ( Romania ) ; South West Region of Bulgaria ; Crete ( Island of Greece ) ; Madeira ( Island of Portugal ) ; Balearic Islands ( Spain ) . As we will see. the bulk of menaces ( so. jobs ) with which those 5 finishs face. are common. Finally. all the menaces will be summarize in general and that for certain will give us the thought that touristry have to modified it scheme. with more stakeholder cooperation. the 1s that should be prepared to run into and take advantage of distinction. Otherwise “too much touristry killed tourism” so a stronger preventive attack has to be embedded in touristry schemes and concern actions. Second we will present the chief jobs of specialisation on touristry which are common for whole universe touristry and which have influence on the betterment of public assistance of states. This portion will demo non-economic sides of touristry in general. It will give us the chance to reason that specialisation on touristry is non the optimum pick for the province and it may do a catastrophe. but non a success.
Besides we will speak about touristry policy and jobs of its execution. Finally we are traveling to depict economic jobs with which touristry specialized states ( or finishs ) face all the clip in shot- and long-term positions. This portion is chiefly built on the consideration of “Dutch disease” . Dutch Disease refers to the relationship between natural resource exports and the diminution of the fabrication sector. The reaction of an economic system shocks the foreign currency influxs. trigger as natural resources roars. rushs in capital influxs. foreign assistance. remittals and others. All this consequence. as evidently. leads to an grasp of the existent exchange rate. generate factor reallocation. and cut down fabrication end product and net exports. Our surveies will demo that economic systems that are to a great extent orientated towards touristry. show marks of Dutch disease and as a consequence. their economic growing might be compromised in approaching old ages.
Negative IMPACTS OF TOURISM SPECIALIZATION
Tourism is seen by many as a agency for economic growing. In fact. many instance surveies would propose that this is true. But from the other manus we know that there are a batch of negative impacts and menaces in this country. We would wish to get down from briefly Summaries harmonizing with Regional Tourism Reports. This information was proved by portion of executing SWOT analysis for European industry. It presents the analysis on the current province of touristry in each Region. the SWOT analysis prepared by the spouses of TOUREG and proposed action programs for doing touristry in each Region more competitory. So following we will summary the five Regional studies harmonizing merely to each menace for touristry in: South West Oltenia ( Romania ) ; South West Region of Bulgaria ; Crete ( Island of Greece ) ; Madeira ( Island of Portugal ) ; Balearic Islands ( Spain ) . In the recent decennaries all those finishs experienced a touristic roar. thanks to the extraordinary success in their touristry industries. However. in the last few old ages they receive merely undergone moderate or inexistent economic growing. THREATS Analysis for South West Oltenia ( Romania ) :
* Tourist resources impairment because of unequal development and development of other signifiers of competitory economic capitalisation ( industry. agribusiness ) * Constructing a negative image over the aims in the cross-border part as a consequence of an unsated touristry petition * Strong competition
* Low degree of fight for regional touristry offer in comparing with other parts in Romania or abroad * Strong international competition
* Insufficient and low technological instruction chances
THREATS Analysis for South West Region of Bulgaria
* Gradually loss of the present major competitory advantage. the low monetary values ( or designation with a “cheap” finish image ) * Non-continuity of authorities accent and support of the touristry * Deductions from legislative alterations from EU Accession * Lack of execution spacial planning tourer countries * Effect of mass touristry targeted runs of competitory * Continuing overdependence on international mass touristry circuit operators * Failure to accomplish advertizement deepness due to deficient support * Negative influences by issues where Bulgaria itself can non easy step in such as several natural phenomena. diseases and terrorist onslaughts
THREATS Analysis for Crete:
* Strong competition in an international degree
* Environmental menace: unrestricted tourer development amendss natural environment
* Limited touristry scruples
* Inadequate touristry instruction and preparation system
* Tourism demand may be reduced by the planetary fiscal crisis
THREATS Analysis for Madeira:
* The addition of constructing rate that can deprecate what tourers expect from their finish
THREATS Analysis for the Balearic Islands:
* Loss of tourers and loss of benefits per tourer for the turning competency of other finishs. non merely in monetary value. but besides in quality
* New emerging finishs
* High grade of seasonal fluctuation
* High force per unit area over certain natural resources
* Business uncertainness confronting the fiscal crisis
* Decreasing handiness of European financess for the part ( Global SWOT
Analysis ( 2009 )
What can we see is that in all these analysis studies have been performed. with the chief thought of placing the general Threats for Tourism ( in this instance harmonizing to different parts ) . Synthesis of all these points refering all menaces. place common issues as: Strong competition in an international degree ; Global crisis alterations tourist profiles ; High force per unit area over certain natural resources ; Seasonal fluctuation with really strong touristry traffic during summer ; Inadequate instruction system for touristry sector.
As we have pure competition market. it is difficult to set up the monetary values and so to acquire a good benefit. So. as stronger competition we have. as more differentiated has to be tourism merchandise and as harder for the finish is to be attractive for the tourers. Of class we have to see effects of the planetary fiscal crisis. which profoundly effected universe economic system in general and budget limitations of people in peculiar. As we know touristry is chiefly normal good with snap & gt ; 0 or luxury good with snap & gt ; 1. which means that with increasing of budget the demand for the touristry will increase and frailty versa. So. if the income was affected in negative manner. the demand decreased.
Heavy use of non-renewable natural resources can take to their faster depreciation and evident depletion of them in association with touristry. Most touristry finishs are affected by seasonality. Seasonal demand causes assorted jobs for local houses and disposals haltering the efficient usage of available installations and the development of local capablenesss. It has frequently been argued that touristry services are intensive labour. houses chiefly require a low degree of instruction and preparation. In this manner. tourer specialisation discourages investing in professional preparation.
Seasonality. of class. exists non merely in touristry but besides occurs in a broad scope of other industrial and agricultural sectors. But for touristry industry seasonality has long been recognized as one of the most typical characteristics. and after the motion of people on a impermanent footing. may be the most typical feature of touristry on a planetary footing. Seasonality in touristry may be defined as a temporal instability in the phenomenon of touristry. which may be expressed in footings of dimensions of such elements as Numberss of visitants. outgo of visitants. traffic on main roads and other signifiers of transit. employment and admittances to attractive forces. ( Butler. R. W. . 2001 ) .
Seasonality is one of a major job for the touristry industry. It extremely causes creative activity of legion troubles faced by the industry. such as jobs in deriving entree to capital. in obtaining and keeping full-time staff. for low returns on investing doing subsequent high hazard in operations. and for jobs associating to top outing and overexploitation of installations. Different writers have their ain attacks in categorizing of causes of touristry seasonality. Drumhead we can foreground the chief of them:
* natural seasonality.
* institutionalized seasonality.
* calendar effects.
* sociological and economic causes.
* societal force per unit area and manner ;
* featuring seasons ;
* inactiveness and tradition ( Koenig N. . Bischoff E. ( 2004 )
Of class the presence of seasonality causes fluctuations in touristry demand. In table 1 we would wish to present Causes of Seasonality and Tourism Examples of it ( Frechtling. 2001 ) : Table 1.
Causes of seasonality | Tourism examples |
Climate/weather | Summer holidaies. snow skiing. autumn leaf Tourss. popularity of tropical finishs in the winter. sail line goings. ocean resort demand. transport entree | Social customs/ vacations | Christmas/New Year holidays. school interruptions. industrial vacations or ‘fortnights’ . travel to see friends and relations. carnivals and festivals. spiritual observations. pilgrim’s journeies | Business imposts | Conventions and trade shows. authorities assemblies. political run Tourss. athleticss events | Calendar effects | Number of yearss in the month ; figure of weekends in the month. one-fourth. season or twelvemonth. day of the month of Easter | Supply side restraints | Availability of labor ( school vacations. competition from other sectors. i. e. agribusiness ) ; alternate usage of installations ( schools to hotels ) |
The impacts of seasonality vary well with the location of the finish and the location of the touristry enterprises within a finish. reflecting in portion the assortment of physical conditions and the nature of the attractive forces ( Baum & A ; Hagen. 1999 ) . The WTO ( 1984 ) . for case. provinces that the most specialised finishs are normally the most seasonal.
The socio-cultural impacts of conventional touristry are the effects on host communities of direct and indirect dealingss with tourers and of interaction with the touristry industry and in the opposite manner. So. socio-cultural impacts in touristry include two types of effects: the effects on the host community ; the effects on the visitants. The negative impact on the local community people includes congestion. crowded streets. intensive and slower traffic. deficiency of parking. increasing of the clip pending for services. important additions in the costs of community services. due to dramatic additions in population during the high season months. which place a strain on regular substructure and services ( Murphy. 1985 ) . For that grounds extra installations are required and excess constabulary. healthful. wellness and park forces have to be hired during the tourer extremum season to keep the sufficient degrees of provided services. But the sum raised from the local revenue enhancement base and cardinal authorities grants is non ever sufficient. as the sums are normally calculated in relation to the resident visitants and occupants likewise.
Other impacts relate to higher monetary values largely during the extremum season. but besides all over the twelvemonth ( nutrient & A ; drinks. conveyance costs. monetary values for existent estate and general costs of life ) increased hazards of accidents and negative influences on the quality of life. Those grounds lead to the unreal decreasing of buying power and public assistance degree of local community by inordinate monetary values. Besides it is necessary to advert the offense as a negative factor. There are a batch of documents dedicated to pulling links between touristry and increased offense due to the higher figure of people present during the extremum season. The presence of a big figure of tourers with a batch of money to pass and frequently transporting valuables such as cameras and jewelry increases the attractive force for felons and brings with it activities like robbery and drug dealing. Equally long as tourers are traveling to hold a holiday they know that they are able to allow themselves to make more than they used to make in the regular life. For illustration. more nightlife. more intoxicant. drugs.
Although touristry is non the cause of sexual development. it provides easy entree to it. Of class all this leads to the increasing of offense degree and decreasing of composure in the mass touristry finishs. Other factor that should be mentioned is the transporting capacity of the finish. We can specify different signifiers of transporting capacity referred to in touristry: the physical. economic. societal and biophysical. The economic and societal capacities can be enlarged. But benefits increasing can’t be reached instantly: it needs investings ( it is hard to pull investors or loaners from the private sectors. and investings from public governments may therefore turn out necessary. authorities permissions. clip and excess disbursement for diversifying of finish. The physical and biophysical carrying capacities are fixed.
So if we understand that we can’t increase transporting capacity of finish we can’t increase our grosss in regard to this factor. Environmental impacts are mostly synonymous with the negative effects happening due to the concentration of visitants during the extremum season at a finish. These include. for illustration. congested rural lanes. perturbation of wildlife. physical eroding of pathwaies and litter jobs. The strain of touristry activities on the ecological carrying capacity of a peculiar finish. due to the heavy use during the extremum season. It is necessary to be pointed out that the strength of the force per unit area on frequently delicate environments caused by overcrowding and overexploitation during the summer is frequently cited as one of the chief environmental jobs of touristry seasonality.
What is worse is that countries which have the usage spread more equally throughout the twelvemonth may be in the long tally overused even faster. So. we have to province that the drawn-out ‘dead’ season is the lone opportunity for the ecological and the societal environment to retrieve to the full. So. even if we mention that touristry kills the environment in high season we besides have to take a firm stand that the finishs with the less uttered seasonality suffer even more. Anyway we see extremely intensive development of natural resources. Here we have to see the productiveness map:
Q=f ( K. L. NR )
Where K – capital. L – labour. NR – natural resources.
In this instance natural resources are the input and it can’t be pure end product because of absence of instruction ( the deficiency of this factor will be described subsequently ) . When we have failure market ( as a consequence of non-sustainable touristry policy ) the costs of natural resources are non included. Market is non measured in right manner and it leads to overuse and the society will get down to endure from its inadequacy. The copiousness of natural resources generates comparative advantage for the state that possesses them. taking it to specialise in use in production those goods ( largely of exportation of pure good or the goods produced on its base ) . This can take to absence of industrial distinction or even to deindustrialization which in the long tally inhibits the procedure of economic development. There is a hazard of inert development in the long tally. If we do non hold an appropriate authorities policy. in the short term a state might profit from economic improving but there is a hazard of economic decreasing or even debasement. At this minute really few touristry finishs have good sustainable touristry policy. that’s why there are over utilizing of natural resources. over fouling on the finishs etc.
Tourism – one of the most unstable concerns and there is a large job to do anticipations of growing and understanding about hereafter of the finish. Contacts and consciousness are important for the efficient direction of policy formation and execution. This is particularly true in touristry because of its diverseness within the private and public sector. One of the biggest jobs is: the most finishs focus on Numberss of tourers instead than output. and new merchandises are introduced by a finish to advance itself. The other one is that touristry have to integrate issues of already mentioned above transporting capacity. societal and cultural concerns and environmental issues. but those finishs which attract the greatest figure of tourers are aggregate touristry mature finishs. Another large job is that people who are working in touristry sector don’t demand to hold high quality for most of the sorts of occupations ( as servers. cleansing agent suites etc. ) .
That’s why the degree of instruction is diminishing ( this job will be considered below ) . A possible account for the deficiency of integrating of policy enterprises is that touristry is non regarded as of import by many authorities sectors and there is a general deficiency of acknowledgment of touristry on political dockets Normally political relations and plans of different degrees of authoritiess are frequently ill coordinated. Sometimes different degrees of authorities are doing regulations. which are wholly contradict of each other.
Policies for sustainable touristry require close coordination with other sectors including revenue enhancement. transit. lodging. societal development. environmental preservation and protection and resource direction. Figure 1 contains the research findings in footings of placing issues of policy execution. The assorted elements which were considered to impede or barricade successful sustainable touristry policy execution are displayed. The eight inner boxes represent an collection of the hindrances to successful execution while the outer boxes provide illustrations to explicate the barriers.
There are besides a batch of jobs concerned to human resources in the touristry specialised finishs. In employment we may specify few chief classs that are jobs for public assistance of community in touristry specialized finish:
* Migration ;
* Gendered nature of touristry employment ;
* Narrow instruction ;
* Absence of investing in instruction of labour etc.
In 2011. the entire part of Travel & A ; Tourism to employment. including occupations indirectly supported by the industry. was 8. 7 % of entire employment ( 254. 941. 000 occupations ) . This is expected to lift by 2. 0 % in 2012 to 260. 093. 000 occupations and rise by 2. 3 % dad to 327. 922. 000 occupations in 2022 ( 9. 8 % of entire ) ( WTTC. 2012 ) . In malice of impressive Numberss we have to advert universe known fact that the tourer and non-tradable sectors are labour intensive ; employment in all parts is chiefly concentrated in the service sector. with fewer occupations in industry and agribusiness. Consequently they have experienced a high degree of in-migration. The extraordinary roar generated an addition in the demand for labour. peculiarly in the tourer and building industries. Migration theory explains the mobility of people based on pull and push factors. In footings of pull factors that attract outside labour to migrate to a certain finish. touristry develops in little towns or states where integrating is much easier compared to an urban scene. As touristry industry chiefly employs low skilled or semi-skilled labour. deficiency of experience or instruction does non represent a job in initial employment. as on-the-job-training is preferred by employers.
The gendered nature of touristry employment shows that females are more involved in the service in touristry. Equally shortly as finish becomes touristry specialized more and more people start to work in this sector. More than 60 % of labour involved in touristry is low educated: the touristry and cordial reception sector requires non more than primary instruction. The personal demands for the staff are: minimal experience ( more than 1 twelvemonth for known trade names ) . attractive visual aspect. communicating. sociableness. cognition of linguistic communications ( optional. depends of the market orientation of employer ) . Besides should be mentioned that employers doesn’t put a batch into the improving of instruction of the material at least because the labour largely hires for a season. One of the chief beginnings of long term economic growing is investing in research and development ( R & A ; D ) ( Segerstrom. 1991 ) .
However. the non-tradable sector and the tourer industry are less receptive to technological advancement and invention ; so they have low degree of investing in R & A ; D in relation to their entire GDPs and they are in the section with the least figure of workers employed in hi-tech occupations. Equally shortly as finish Begin to be specialized on touristry labour began to migrate: industry workers. agricultural workers. scientists etc. get down to look for a occupation in the sector which develops more than others. So all what is invested in instruction is the narrow specified profile.
The motion of labour and force per unit area of the internal demand brings about an addition in the monetary value of non-tradable trade goods and. because the monetary value of tradable trade goods is internationally determined by universe markets. the existent exchange rate rises. cut downing the fight of the tradable sector and the net exports diminishing. As we have an internal demand we have to accept the given monetary value. That’s why we have to cut down production. because we can’t maintain the same sum of production. as we can’t raise the monetary values. In the graph below we can see how monetary values are depended on supply. Monetary value in international sector can’t addition. but monetary values of non-tradable sectors are increasing. that is why international supply is diminishing.
Corden ( 1984 ) besides mentions a likely addition in in-migration to the part in response to the roar and addition in rewards. On the one manus. the inflow of foreign labour slows down the industrial diminution by run intoing the increased demand for labour in the tourer industry. without workers necessitating to be diverted from the tradable and non-tradable sectors. On the other manus. nevertheless. there is a specific de-industrialization. because in-migration brings about an addition in the demand for non-tradable trade goods and. accordingly. a rise in matching monetary values: fortunes that lead to a autumn in production by the tradable sector. In the following graph we can see that if rewards in touristry sector are increasing. the production sector have to increase the rewards excessively. but the same clip Labor on production sector will diminish
In malice of everything. it has been argued that the term ‘disease’ has an inappropriate negative intension ( Van Wijnbergen. 1984 ) . because the purpose is to depict a displacement in production from some sectors to others. for grounds related to efficiency. Harmonizing to the Heckscher–Ohlin international trade theory an economic system produces those goods that require an intense usage of the more abundant factor more expeditiously. In this sense. the diminution of the fabrication sector could be construed as an optimal response to the increased wealth generated by the region’s natural tourer attractive forces. The swing from the production of tradable trade goods to non-tradable 1s is simply a signifier of self-adjustment or. in other words. the expression used by the economic system to accommodate to the lifting domestic demand. It can be argued that Dutch disease leads to a alteration in the composing of exports. with a diminution in the importance of the fabrication sector. which is more receptive to technological development and invention. An copiousness of natural resources diverts production off from sectors traditionally associated with ‘learning by doing’ .
Therefore. when resources are drawn off from fabricating sectors where ‘practical learning’ is typical. this affects the economy’s growing potency by curtailing an of import beginning of human development and productiveness growing. Foreign investing can besides be unsafe for the host economic system. chiefly those which are developing economic systems. Equally far as a large portion of many hotels. resorts and other assets. which are intensively consumed by tourers. are owned by non-residents the benefit is got by them but non by the local community. So all this is the chief flow of escapes for the economic system ( besides as the parts migrators rewards. the money spend for franchising in touristry concern. imported goods and services etc. ) . And as the consequence we have welfare losingss for occupants.
In the long tally. the growing of an economic system affected by Dutch disease can be hindered due to the lower preparation degrees associated with the development of natural resources. since these sectors by and large tend to hold a higher proportion of unskilled or low quality ( non- qualificated ) workers. However. seeking is frequently related to corruptness in concern and authorities. falsifying the allotment of resources and cut downing economic efficiency and societal equity. Furthermore. because Dutch disease reduces the fight of domestic industry. the governments might try to protect the diminished local fabrication sector alternatively of to the full opening up the economic system. Again. in both instances. grounds has been found that economic growing is reduced ( Bardhan. 1997 ; Tornell & A ; Lane. 1999 ) . Finally we would wish to show the back-to-back strategy of Dutch disease which can look in every touristry specialized finish.
Specialization in touristry has specific negative impacts on the economic system and general public assistance of the society which chooses to specialise. Foreign ownership causes leakages whereby net incomes earned in the host economic system. concerns and the community need to achieve sufficient grosss from a few feverish hebdomads in the summer in order to guarantee success for the whole twelvemonth. This causes locals in the host economic system to lose out on money that could hold been kept at that place. The chief hazard with specialisation is a diminution in the growing of exports brought approximately by the depletion of natural resources ( loss of scenic features/quality of life possibly through inappropriate development ) . or instead. a bead in the monetary value of the touristry merchandise. motivated by a autumn in international demand or the visual aspect of a new replacement finish. in both instances taking to a drawn-out period of painful accommodation. Specialization in touristry besides creates low-skilled and narrow specialized work force. This work force so has limited chances outside of touristry. which can make an economic dependance on touristry. And narrow specialisation ( and as the effect. dependance ) on touristry can so be easy threatened by lower priced outside competition.
So the job in touristry economic systems is related to the exogenic nature of their comparative advantage. the natural resources. Trying to take net incomes from natural resources neglects the creative activity of internal comparative advantages like invention and labour preparation. The solution is non to abandon touristry or to look for a more diversified economic system ; specialisation is good and many economic systems have no options. Tourism specialised economic systems can happen jobs if the touristry industry is land intensive or even if it is labour intensive. A more land intensive touristry industry leads to higher unemployment and equivocal public assistance consequences. A labour intensive touristry industry leads to de-industrialization. So parts or states whose tourer industries are undergoing a procedure of rapid enlargement must accurately measure the long term effects of specialising in touristry and Dutch disease. rectifying the low leaning for invention. instruction and preparation.
The demand for a balanced economic system. for incorporating agricultural economic systems with touristry ( through selling. usage of local merchandises. farm touristry. etc. ) and the demand to pull new endeavors. particularly those related to new engineerings. to travel to tourism countries. are all portion of sustainable touristry development. The specialisation in touristry besides amendss the natural and societal cultural environment. By the nature of travel and the increased figure of people in one location there is more pollution and a greater opportunity to do environmental harm. Tourists besides impose their civilization on occupants in the host economic system through their actions and the merchandises that they demand.
So. instead than concentrating on specialisation in touristry. economic systems should concentrate on diversifying the touristry merchandise that they offer in order to cut down the negative impacts that touristry can bring forth. Finally. the intent of this paper is to offer grounds that the five parts survey in this study with the most extremely specialised tourer economic systems. both show marks of the phenomenon described in the economic literature as Dutch disease. Although it must be stressed that the beginning of the job of Dutch disease in touristry economic systems is non the copiousness of natural resources or economic specialisation. It is the failure by economic agents to pay sufficient attending to the determiners of long term economic growing.
1. Aslihan Aykac ( 2010 ) “Tourism Employment: Towards An Integrated Policy Approach” 2. BUTLER R. W. . “Seasonality in Tourism – Issues and
Implications” . “Seasonality in Tourism” . Pergamon. 2001. pp. 5-22 3. Chi-Chur Chaoa. Bharat R. Hazarib. Pasquale M. Sgrob “Tourism. globalisation. societal outwardnesss. and domestic welfare” . Research in International Business and Finance. Volume 18. Issue 2. June 2004. Pages 141–149 4. Copeland. B. ( 1991 ) “Tourism. public assistance and de-industrialization in a little unfastened economy” 5. Corden WM ( 1984 ) . “Boom Sector and Dutch Disease Economics: Survey and Consolidation” . Oxford Economic Documents 36: 362 6. Fitzpatrick Associates ( 1993 ) “Tourism in the European Community: The Impact of the Single Market” 7. Frechtling. D. C. ( 2001 ) “Forecasting Tourism Demand: Methods and Strategies” . Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. 8. Grant. M. . B. Human and B. Le Pelley ( 1997 ) . “More than Geting from A to B: Conveyance Schemes and Tourism” 9. Juin-Jen Chang. Lee-Jung Lu. Shih-Wen Hu ( 2011 ) . “Congestion Outwardnesss of Tourism. Dutch Disease and Optimal Taxation: Macroeconomic Implications” 10. Koenig N. . Bischoff E. ( 2004 ) “Seasonality Research: The State Of The Art” 11. Maning. R. . and L. Powers ( 1984 ) “Peak and Off-Peak Use: Redistributing the Outdoor” 12. Murphy E ( 1985 ) “Tourism: A Community Approach”
13. Nowak. J. ; Sahli. M. ( 2007 ) ”Coastal touristry and Dutch disease in a little island economy” 14. Segerstrom. Paul S. 1991. “Innovation. Imitation. and Economic Growth” Journal of Political Economy. University of Chicago Press. vol. 99 ( 4 ) . pages 807-27 15. Global SWOT Analysis ( 2009 ) study produced for TOUREG Project. Deliverable D. 2. 1 by the Department of Tourism Management of the Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki. Greece and the Technical University of Crete. Greece 16. World Travel & A ; Tourism Council ( WTTC ) Travel & A ; Tourism Economic Impact 2012